Economic benefits of mass sport events

Фотографии: 

ˑ: 

PhD, Associate Professor E.A. Gureeva1
PhD T.V. Skryl1
PhD Y.A. Sukhanovsky1
A.D. Askarov1
1Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow

 

Keywords: sport, efficiency, country, management, mass sport events, region, finance, crisis, traditional games, ethnic sports.

Background. Modern sports tend to evolve as any non-industrial sector with the naturally occurring and developing competitive relationships both with the key outside competitors on the market of entertainment within the relevant cultural fields (cinema, theatre, circus etc.) and the inside ones, i.e. competing sport events striving to lure as many spectators as possible to secure high profitability.

It should also be noted that the growing budgetary constraints, doping scandals and economic sanctions force the national sport communities give a higher priority to home sport and folk events with due emphasis on their profitability issues. The relevant policies need to be worked out and pursued by the national and local governments.

Presently the issues of the national government policies and role in the sport sector regulation are subject to discussions in the academic and political circles. In view of the growing pressure and threats from the global sport associations, the inactive governmental policies have become subject to sharp criticism in the country. However, the government still needs to contribute to the sport relationships acting as a mediator in relations of the governmental agencies, different sport federations, business communities and people. It should be mentioned that most of the mass sport events in the country are financed from the local government budgets that means that it is the population of the host regions that actually pays most of the costs of the events. Commercial revenues generated by the events may partially offset the relevant organisation and management costs.

Objective of the study was to analyse the importance of mass sport events for the host communities and their willingness to finance the events from the communal or individual funds.

Methods and structure of the study. To obtain data on the importance of traditional games and ethnic festivals, a Russian survey was initiated and sponsored by the Federation of Traditional Festivals and Ethnic Sports of Russia, a Russian Non-governmental Organisation with a research support provided by G.V. Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. Subject to a representative sample for the survey were 23 regions of the Russian Federation and 830 respondents in total. The key topic of the survey was the respondents’ willingness to pay with identification of the amount that may be reasonably allocated from the incomes; and the social and economic benefits rating component with consideration for the individual traits of each respondent. The respondents were offered a dichotomous choice of amounts that they could possibly allocate to such mass sport events and ethnic parks development projects. The survey data were additionally analysed to find the region-specific variations. 

Study results and discussion. Most of the respondents rated the events as important and contributing to the host region progress in a variety of aspects including improvement of the region’s image; protection of the historical and cultural traditions; and growth of the tourist attractiveness of the region: see Table 1.

Table 1. Impacts of traditional sport games and ethnic festivals on the regional progress, %

 

 

Regions of the RF

Image improvement

Growing tourist attractiveness

Protection of historical and cultural traditions

very important

important

non-important

very important

important

non-important

very important

important

non-important

Russian Federation

49

45

6

52

42

6

68

29

3

Bashkortostan Republic

64

34

2

52

36

12

68

26

6

Buryatia Republic

52

44

4

66

28

6

68

26

6

Irkutsk Region

47

47

6

50

47

3

74

24

3

Kalmykiya Republic

52

46

2

62

38

0

68

30

2

Kamchatka Territory

57

33

10

59

35

6

65

35

0

Komi Republic

57

39

5

59

41

0

64

34

2

Moscow

51

43

6

47

49

4

76

20

4

Omsk Region

57

40

4

38

55

8

75

23

2

Perm Territory

13

73

13

23

65

12

54

46

0

Rostov Region

42

50

8

38

52

10

58

40

2

Saint Petersburg

57

28

15

65

30

6

69

22

9

Tyva Republic

62

38

0

62

35

4

81

19

0

Khabarovsk Territory

78

19

4

81

11

7

93

7

0

Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Region

10

84

6

22

70

8

42

58

0

Chechen Republic

74

26

0

74

26

0

78

22

0

Chuvash Republic

43

50

7

41

57

2

68

32

0

Yaroslavl Region

50

48

2

58

36

6

64

34

2

Other regions of the RF

39

50

11

50

36

14

73

21

6

It was the personal competitive and valuable socialising (contesting, gaming, national meals cooking etc.) experience and the opportunity to buy folk garments and souvenirs etc. that were reported among the key motivators for the local people to participate in traditional games, ethnic festivals, entertainment, dances etc.: see Table 2.

Table 2. Key motivators for participation in traditional games and ethnic festivals, %

 

 

Regions of the RF

Personal experience of folk games, entertainment, dances etc.

National meals cooking and testing experience

Opportunity to buy folk garments and souvenirs

very important

important

non-important

very important

important

non-important

very important

important

non-important

Russian Federation

26

49

25

35

47

18

21

48

31

Bashkortostan Republic

24

54

22

34

56

10

20

54

26

Buryatia Republic

18

54

28

30

50

20

16

48

36

Irkutsk Region

21

44

35

35

38

26

18

47

35

Kalmykiya Republic

20

52

28

34

54

12

18

52

30

Kamchatka Territory

25

45

29

27

51

22

25

33

41

Komi Republic

32

43

25

34

48

18

20

64

16

Moscow

14

57

29

35

41

24

8

53

39

Omsk Region

40

36

25

47

38

15

26

55

19

Perm Territory

6

75

19

10

75

15

2

44

54

Rostov Region

12

48

40

20

56

24

12

42

46

Saint Petersburg

13

44

43

22

54

24

9

41

50

Tyva Republic

46

48

6

65

33

2

60

38

2

Khabarovsk Territory

63

30

7

78

22

0

63

26

11

Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Region

20

72

8

30

66

4

28

68

4

Chechen Republic

22

48

30

40

28

32

16

48

36

Chuvash Republic

27

57

16

25

52

23

18

50

32

Yaroslavl Region

30

34

36

34

42

24

12

56

32

Other regions of the RF

45

30

24

39

38

23

24

45

30

It should be noted that the key motivators for traditional sport games and folk festivals are closely associated with the amount the people are willing to pay for fun. It was the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Region and Tyva Republic that leaded in the people’s willingness to pay (above RUB1500 on average) for participation in the events, with the amount being twice as high as that of the nearest rival, Khabarovsk Territory, and three times as high as the Russian average. It is noteworthy that the Moscow residents are willing to pay only RUB400 on average that is close to the bottom level.

If we now multiply the average amount per capita on the total population of the region, it gives the total amount potentially payable by the host region population to support the ethnic parks development projects. A similar calculation procedure was used to obtain the potential average revenue per match-day: see Table 3.

Table 3. Region-specific willingness to pay (WTP) for traditional games and ethnic festivals

Region of the RF

WTP for an ethnic park development project, RUB per capita

 

WTP for ethnic park development project, RUB mln, total

WTP for match-day, RUB per capita

WTP for match-day, RUB mln, total

Bashkortostan Republic

341,1

1 389,1

427,6

1 741,1

Buryatia Republic

353,7

346,1

506,2

495,3

Irkutsk region

427,7

1 032,8

457,7

1 105,4

Kalmykiya Republic

221,7

62,2

221,7

62,2

Kamchatka Territory

314,4

99,7

508,6

161,3

Komi Republic

364,4

315,0

686,0

593,0

Moscow

200,4

2 443,8

397,6

4850,1

Omsk Region

431,6

853,7

612,5

1 211,6

Perm Territory

364,3

960,6

439,9

1 159,9

Rostov Region

320,7

1 360,4

457,5

1 940,6

Saint Petersburg

323,1

1 677,6

513,8

2 667,6

Tyva Republic

820,8

257,6

1501,0

471,0

Khabarovsk Territory

1 018,9

1 363,6

759,8

1 016,8

Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Region

199,6

321,8

1507,5

2 430,3

Chechen Republic

360,0

493,3

457,5

626,8

Chuvash Republic

282,2

349,4

493,0

610,4

Yaroslavl Region

377,3

479,7

463,7

589,7

Russian Federation

397,0

58 072

595,1

87 050

Having analysed the outcome data of the survey, we categorised the regions into the following five WTP (willingness to pay) categories: see Table 4.

Table 4. Traditional games and ethnic sports: Russian regions ranked by the interest and willingness-to-pay

Group

Regions of the RF

Group 1: the most interested

Moscow, Tyva Republic, Khabarovsk Territory

Group 2

Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Region, Saint Petersburg

Group 3

Omsk Region, Irkutsk Region

Group 4

Perm Region, Rostov Region, Komi Republic, Bashkortostan Republic

Group 5: the least interested

Kalmykiya Republic, Buryatia Republic, Kamchatka Territory, Chechen Republic, Chuvash Republic, Yaroslavl Region

Most promising regions for the ethnic sports are Moscow, Tyva Republic and Khabarovsk Territory; going next are the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Region and Saint Petersburg; and they are closely followed by the Omsk Region and Irkutsk Region; whilst all the other regions were found still little interested in such events.

It was found that the structure of revenues generated by the mass sport events is much different from the typical match-day one. The match-day revenues are normally dominated by the daily income from the ticket sales, public catering services, sales of souvenirs and incomes from other services offered by the organisers (Gureyeva, 2016). The key difference is that tickets are not sold in the mass sport events whereas this is the key revenue element of a match-day. The mass folk festivals mostly yield incomes from sales of souvenirs, items of folk arts, national foods, folk garments, masks etc. When these revenues are high enough, they may partially offset the costs of the events.

Conclusion. Based on the study data and analysis, we would recommend the following measures to increase benefits of the mass sport and folk events: improve cooperation of the sport stakeholders at the Federal and regional levels; stimulate the purchase capacity of the local population by establishing facilitating conditions in the regions and in the country on the whole; popularise ethnic sports and mass sport events; efficiently mobilise and employ the available resource in every region for success of mass sport and folk events; and provide special financing to the regions where interest in the events is still relatively low.

References

  1. Averyasov V.V. Formirovanie sportivnoy kultury studentov kak vazhny faktor razvitiya studencheskogo sporta v Rossii [Cultivating sports culture in students as key factor in development of university sports in Russia]. Mater. Vseros. nauch.-metod. konf. "Strategiya razvitiya sportivno-massovoy raboty so studentami" [Proc. Rus. res.-method. conf. "Strategy for development of mass sports activities with students"], 2015, pp. 7-11.
  2. Andryushchenko L.B., Orlan I.V., Loseva I.V., Shutova T.N. Sportizatsiya fizicheskogo vospitaniya v sisteme obrazovaniya: novye vektory razvitiya i formirovaniya gotovnosti u studentov k razvitiyu fizicheskoy kultury i sporta kak dolgosrochny federalny innovatsionny proekt [Sportization of physical education in education system: new vectors of formation and building of students' skills for development of physical culture and sports as long-term federal innovation project]. Mater. I Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem "Nauchno-pedagogicheskie shkoly v sfere sporta i fizicheskogo vospitaniya" [Proc. I Rus. res.-pract. conf. with internat. partic. "Pedagogical scholar schools in the field of sports and physical education"]. RSUPESYT publ., 2016, pp. 244-251.
  3. Gureeva E.A. Sistema reytingovaniya subjektov RF kak instrument upravleniya i raspredeleniya byudzhetnykh sredstv v sfere fizicheskoy kulture i sporta [RF subjects rating system as a tool for managing and distributing budgetary funds in physical culture and sports sector]. Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo, 2016, no. 10-2 (75-2), pp. 209-211.
  4. Gureeva E.A., Kylasov A.V. Sotsiokulturnye i ekonomicheskie aspekty proektirovaniya traditsionnykh igr [Sociocultural and economic aspects of traditional games design]. Vestnik REU im. G.V. Plekhanova, 2016, no. 5 (89), pp. 133–138.
  5. Gureeva E.A., Kylasov A.V., Redkin E.L. Osobennosti finansirovaniya meropriyatiy massovogo sporta na primere provedeniya traditsionnykh igr v Yugre [Specifics of financing of mass sports events (case study of traditional games held in Yugra]. Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo, 2016, no. 11-1(76-1), pp. 782-784.
  6. Kylasov A.V., Kuchmaeva O.V. Rezultaty vserossiyskogo oprosa na temu «Gotovnost grazhdan k uvelicheniyu zatrat na provedenie narodnykh prazdnikov» [Results of national survey "Citizens' willingness to increase cost of public holidays"]. Kulturnoe nasledie Rossii, 2016, no. 3 (14), pp. 51–59.
  7. Nureev R.M., Markin E.V. Izderzhki i vygody Olimpiyskikh igr [Costs and benefits of the Olympic Games]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost, 2010, no.1, pp. 88-104.
  8. Skryl T.V. Analiz provedeniya sovremennoy ekonomicheskoy politiki i ee vliyanie na turisticheskuyu industriyu [Analysis of current economic policy and its impact on tourism industry]. News of Science and Education, 2016, vol. 10, pp. 7-16.
  9. Skryl T.V. Strategiya gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya transformiruyushcheysya ekonomiki [Strategy of state regulation of transforming economy]. TsITISE, 2016, no. 1 (5), p. 2.
  10. McDonnell I., Allen J., O'Toole W. Festival and special event management. Jacaranda Wiley, Brisbane, 1999.

Corresponding author: eagureeva@gmail.com

Abstract

In the context of the modern economic and political challenges, and the increasing numbers of study reports exploring the ways to improve the efficiency of mass sport events on the whole and ethnic events in particular a top priority is being given to the issues of economic benefits of mass sport events. Objective of the study was to analyse the importance of mass sport events for host communities and their willingness to finance the events from the communal or individual funds. The study was based on the data of the Russian survey initiated and sponsored by the Federation of Traditional Festivals and Ethnic Sports of Russia, a Russian Non-governmental Organisation with a research support provided by G.V. Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. Subject to a representative sample under the study were 23 regions of the RF. The study data was indicative of the mass sport events being beneficial as verified by a variety of criteria including the host region’s image improvement; protection of the cultural and historic traditions; and the growing attractiveness of the host region for tourists. It was the personal competitive and valuable socialising experience that was found the key motivator for participation of the local communities in the traditional games and festivals. Having analysed the outcome data of the survey, we categorised the regions into five WTP (willingness to pay) categories. Furthermore, the study produced a classified account of the average income generated by the mass sport events versus the average revenues from the traditional match-days. The study findings gave the grounds for the authors to highlight the most promising avenues for the mass sport events hosting projects.