Athletes' values: a new comparative approach

ˑ: 

Kolyadin N.P.
Institute for Psychological and Economic Research, Saratov

Manokhina N.V.
Saratov National Research State University named after N.G. Chernyshevsky, Saratov

Katkova M.A.
The Russian University of Sport «GTSOLIFK», Moscow

Lipovenko A.S.
The Russian University of Sport «GTSOLIFK», Moscow

Objective of the study is to substantiate the use of the comparative method of comparing scientific approaches in the analysis of traditional spiritual and moral values ​​of athletes.
Methods and structure of the study. For the methodological assessment of scientific approaches to the analysis of value orientations of athletes within the framework of the comparative method, the criteria were established by which the comparison was carried out: ideas about the value of sport among athletes from different countries; value attitudes of athletes from different cultural environments; differences in the value system among athletes of different gender, age, level of training; the dynamics of change in values ​​depending on social, historical and political factors.
Results and conclusions. Comparative studies in the analysis of athletes' values ​​allowed to establish significant personal characteristics, in particular, such qualities as autopoieticity – self-completion, heredity and variability, and within the framework of the cognitive-behavioral approach – their implicit, hidden contradictions, their inherent dissonances and distortions, established and forming relationships in the internal and external environment, which should be used in the development of various social techniques, behavioral engineering, cognitive practices for the acceptance and maintenance, development of athletes' values.

Keywords: comparative approach, comparative studies, athletes' values, cognitive-behavioral approach, autopoiesis, genetic approach.

References

  1. Godovanik E.V. Politicization of sport in the modern world: a legal perspective on the problem [Politicization of Sports in the Modern World: A Legal. 2024. No. 02. DOI: 10.18572 / 2070-2175-2024-2-5-8.
  2. Kosmina I.P., Antseliovich A.A. [The Fight against Doping in Sports: Attitude, Prevention, Prospects]. Bulletin of Sports Science, 2022. No. 4.
  3. Kurmakaeva A.K. Diskriminaciya prava zhenshchin (na primere sportivnoj sfery). Borba s dopingom v sporte: otnoshenie, profilaktika, perspektivy. [Discrimination of Women's Rights (on the Example of the Sports Sphere]. Sports: Economics, Law, Management. 2025. No. 02.
  4. Lippi G., Longo W.G. and Maffulli N. Genetics and Sport. British Medical Bulletin. 2009, No. 93 (1), Pp. 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldp007.
  5. Lukyanov A.V., Mazov N.Y. [Sport as a social-value system]. Philosophy and Society. 2008. No. 2 (50). P. 179, 185.
  6. Miyamoto-Mikami, E. and Fuku, N. [Genetics and genomics in sport]. Juntendo Medical Journal, 2020, No. 1, ph. 72–77. https://doi.org/10.14789/jmj.2020.66.jmj19-p12.
  7. Hofstede G. Culture and organizations: programming mentality. M., 2010.
  8. Festinger, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press. 1957. https://web.stanford.edu/group/csbsjracsite/cgi-bin/sites/all/files/Fest...
  9. Maturana, H. and Varela, F. The Tree of Knowledge. New Science Library, Shambhala, Boston. 1988, p. 242.
  10. Ji, Z. Лучший спортсмен: генетика против тренировок. SHS Web of Conferences. 2023. No. 157, P. 04017. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202315704017
  11. Rockeach M. The nature of human values. N.Y.: Free Press, 1973.