Factors that impede the achievement of training effect in physical education lessons at school

ˑ: 

Lukyanenko V.P., Dr. Hab., Professor
North-Caucasus Federal University, Stavropol

Magin V.A., Dr. Hab., Professor
North-Caucasus Federal University, Stavropol

Lukyanenko N.V., PhD, Associate Professor
North-Caucasus Federal University, Stavropol

Objective of the study was to theoretical substantiation of factors that prevent the achievement of a tangible training effect in the context of a physical education lesson in a comprehensive school.
Methods and structure of the study. The scientific work was carried out on the basis of using the methods of analysis and synthesis of the problem situation; comparative analysis; the method of scientific reduction.
Results and conclusions. The article reveals theoretical, methodological, methodological and organizational flaws in the currently implemented approach to organizing educational work on physical education in comprehensive schools, based on the introduction of sports modules into the educational process. Scientifically substantiated facts are presented, as well as arguments formulated on the basis of an appeal to elementary logic and common sense, indicating the fundamental impossibility of achieving any significant effect from the implementation of the training focus in the context of a physical education lesson. The results obtained in the study indicate the need to take urgent measures to minimize the negative consequences of the implementation of the «updated» FOP and FRP on physical education in comprehensive schools. The author's position in assessing the state of the problem and ways to solve it is substantiated.
The materials presented in the article can contribute to improving the content of educational work on physical education in comprehensive schools; eliminating the causes that significantly complicate the high-quality teaching of the subject «Physical education»; improving the quality of general education in the field of physical education; creation of favorable conditions for further more constructive discussion in the professional community of the scientific and practical issues raised in the work. The data obtained in the study can be used as a basis for the development of more scientifically sound and practically useful FGOS, FOP, FRP
for general education in the field of physical education.

Keywords: general physical education, physical education lesson, sports modules, training effect.

References

  1. Gippenreyter, B. S. (1966). Vosstanovitelnyye protsessy pri sportivnoy deyatelnosti [Recovery processes in sports activities] (2nd ed.). Fizkultura i sport.
  2. Issurin, V. B. (2016). Podgotovka sportsmenov XXI veka: nauchnyye osnovy i postroyeniye trenirovki [Preparation of athletes of the 21st century: scientific foundations and training structure]. Sport.
  3. Lukyanenko, V. P. (1999). Sostoyaniye i perspektivy sovershenstvovaniya fizicheskogo vospitaniya shkolnikov v svete sovremennykh kontseptualnykh podkhodov [The state and prospects for improving physical education of schoolchildren in light of modern conceptual approaches]. Fizicheskaya kultura: vospitaniye, obrazovaniye, trenirovka, 1-2, 18-25.
  4. Lukyanenko, V. P. (2001). Na ostriye problem shkolnoy fizkultury [On the cutting edge of school physical education problems]. Fizicheskaya kultura: vospitaniye, obrazovaniye trenirovka, 2, 39-44.
  5. Lukyanenko, V. P. (2002). Issledovaniye problemy sootnosheniya dvigatelnogo i intellektualnogo komponentov soderzhaniya obshchego obrazovaniya v oblasti fizicheskoy kultury [Research of the problem of the relationship between the motor and intellectual components of the content of general education in the field of physical education]. Fizicheskaya kultura: vospitaniye, obrazovaniye, trenirovka, 9, 40-45.
  6. Lyubomirskiy, L. E. (Ed.). (1989). Normirovaniye nagruzok v fizicheskom vospitanii shkolnikov [Standardization of loads in physical education of schoolchildren]. Pedagogika.
  7. Matveev, L. P. (1964). Problema periodizatsii sportivnoy trenirovki [The problem of periodization of sports training]. Fizkultura i sport.
  8. Yakovlev, N. N. (1983). Khimiya dvizheniya: Molekulyarnyye osnovy myshechnoy deyatelnosti [Chemistry of movement: Molecular basis of muscle activity]. Nauka. https://djvu.online/file/ChWchBcA4UADR
  9. Lukyanenko, V. P. (2021). Metodologicheskiy kollaps kontseptsii prepodavaniya uchebnogo predmeta «Fizicheskaya kultura» [Methodological collapse of the concept of teaching the subject «Physical Education»]. Narodnoye obrazovaniye, 6, 93-110.
  10. Lyakh, V. I., & Meykson, G. B. (1991). Vospitaniye, a ne tolko fizicheskaya podgotovka [Education, not just physical training]. Fizicheskaya kultura v shkole, 1, 11.
  11. Satirov, G. N. (1975). Obrazovatelnaya napravlennost uroka [Educational focus of the lesson]. Fizicheskaya kultura v shkole, 3, 9-11.