Economicality as a criterion for assessing the optimality of human physical activity

ˑ: 

PhD, Associate Professor N.A. Vakhnin2
Dr. Hab., Professor Sh.Z. Khubbiev1
PhD, Associate Professor E.S. Novikova2
PhD, Associate Professor S.P. Mikhailovsky2
1Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg
2Saint-Petersburg Mining University of Empress Catherine II, St. Petersburg

Objective of the study was to substantiate cost-effectiveness in the system of criteria for assessing the optimality of human physical activity.
Methods and structure of the study. The scientific work uses an interdisciplinary approach, theoretical analysis and generalization, comparison and observation.
Results and conclusions. Today, optimal physical activity is in demand, which determines the effectiveness of physical education and sports; optimization of physical activity is a tool for increasing adaptability, and it serves as the basis for achieving efficiency of movements; efficiency is manifested at minimal resource costs, when the maximum result of physical activity is possible; therefore it is a criterion for assessing optimality; determination of efficiency is based on a comparison of resource costs and the efficiency of movements, then the efficiency is calculated; The economy of physical activity is better developed in biochemistry, physiology, psychophysiology, biomechanics, and research is relevant in psychology and sports pedagogy.

Keywords: efficiency, optimality criteria, physical activity.

References

  1. Alyakrinsky B.S. Adaptatsiya v aspekte bioritmologii. Problemy vremennoy organizatsii zhivykh sistem [Adaptation in the aspect of biorhythmology. Problems of temporary organization of living systems]. Genin A.I. [ed.]. Moscow: Nauka publ., 1979. pp. 8-36.
  2. Amosov N.M. Razdumya o zdorovye [Thoughts about health]. 3rd ed., sup., rev. Moscow: Fizkultura i sport publ., 1987. 64 p.
  3. Balsevich V.K. Chto nuzhno znat o dvizheniyakh cheloveka [What you need to know about human movements]. Fizicheskaya kultura: nauchno-metodicheskiy zhurnal. No. 2. 1997. pp. 46-50.
  4. Gorinevsky V.V. Izbrannyye proizvedeniya [Selected works]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Fizkultura i sport publ., 1951. 318 p.
  5. Grigoriev V.I., Mokhovikov A.B., Sidorenko S.A. Keys-tekhnologii v atleticheskoy podgotovke studentov [Case technologies in athletic training of students]. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury. 2019. No. 3. pp. 17-19.
  6. Zimkin N.V., Korobkov A.B., Lekhtman Ya.B. et al. Fiziologicheskiye osnovy fizicheskoy kultury i sporta [Physiological foundations of physical culture and sports]. Moscow: Fizkultura i sport publ., 1955. 416 p.
  7. Babansky M.Yu. Izbrannyye pedagogicheskiye trudy [Selected pedagogical works]. Moscow: Pedagogika publ., 1989. 560 p.
  8. Kamshilov M.M. Evolyutsiya biosfery [Evolution of the biosphere]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Nauka publ., 1979. 256 p.
  9. Lesgaft P.F. Sobraniye pedagogicheskikh sochineniy [Collection of pedagogical essays]. Vol. 2. Part 1. Moscow: Fizkultura i sport publ.,1951. 444 p.
  10. Mazanenko O.M. Esteticheskiye korrelyaty tvorcheskogo soznaniya [Aesthetic correlates of creative consciousness]. Vestnik TvGU. Seriya «Filosofiya». 2019. No. 1 (47). pp. 70-80.
  11. Marishchuk V.L. Pereraspredeleniye funktsionalnykh rezervov v organizme sportsmena [Redistribution of functional reserves in the athlete’s body]. Stress i trevoga v sporte. Moscow: Fizkultura i sport publ.,1984. pp. 72-86.
  12. Rosen R. Printsip optimalnosti v biologii [The principle of optimality in biology]. Moscow: AN SSSR publ., 1956. 214 p.
  13. Khubbiev Sh.Z. Kontseptsiya ekologizatsii fizkulturnoy deyatelnosti cheloveka ozdorovitelnoy napravlennosti [The concept of greening human physical activity for health purposes]. Study methodological guide. St. Petersburg: OOO «Knizhnyy dom» publ., 2007. 304 p.