Building a system for independent assessment of educational results of future teachers

ˑ: 

Dr. Hab., Professor E.N. Perevoshchikova1
PhD, Associate Professor A.V. Stafeeva1
PhD, Associate Professor S.V. Frolova1
PhD, Associate Professor T.A. Chepurnova1
E.Yu. Elizarova1
1Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University, Nizhny Novgorod

Objective of the study was the theoretical and methodological substantiation of the construction of a system for independent assessment of the educational results of future teachers (hereinafter referred to as SIA).
Methods and structure of the study. The theoretical and methodological basis for creating a system for independent assessment of the educational results of future teachers is systemic, activity-based, competence-based, criteria-based and level-based approaches that allow to define, reveal the essence and describe the following key components of such a system: goals, objects of assessment, assessment tools, assessment procedures and levels of achievement.
Results and conclusions. On the basis of the selected approaches, the need to consider three types of student activities is substantiated: educational, practice-oriented, professionally-oriented, the results of which allow us to describe their components in the form of measurable actions and assess the degree of achievement of results. Difficulties associated with the assessment of competencies are identified, and the transition to the use of the concept of educational result is justified. The article presents the author's approach to the description of the concepts: educational result, invariant form of presentation of the evaluation tool and levels of achievement of the educational result.

Keywords: independent assessment system, future teacher, educational result, assessment tools, achievement levels.

References

  1. Bershadskaya M.D., Serova A.V., Chepurenko A.Yu., Zima E.A. Kompetentnostnyy podkhod k otsenke obrazovatelnykh rezultatov: opyt rossiyskogo sotsiologicheskogo obrazovaniya [Competence-based approach to the evaluation of educational results: the experience of Russian sociological education]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii. 2019. Vol. 28. No. 2. pp. 38-50.
  2. Bolotov V.A. O postroyenii obshcherossiyskoy sistemy otsenki kachestva obrazovaniya [On the construction of an all-Russian system for assessing the quality of education]. Voprosy obrazovaniya. 2005. No. 1. pp. 5-10.
  3. Kontseptsiya podgotovki pedagogicheskikh kadrov dlya sistemy obrazovaniya na period do 2030 goda. Utverzhdena rasporyazheniyem Pravitelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24 iyunya 2022 g. № 1688-r. [The concept of training teachers for the education system for the period up to 2030. Approved by the order of the Government of the Russian Federation dated June 24, 2022 No. 1688-r.]. Moscow. Available at: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202207010040?index=0&r... (date of access: 06.01.2023).
  4. Kuzminsky A.E. Otnosheniye prepodavateley k kompetentnostnomu podkhodu [The attitude of teachers to the competence-based approach]. Pedagogika i psikhologiya obrazovaniya. 2019. No. 1. pp. 208-217.
  5. Metodicheskiye rekomendatsii po sozdaniyu otsenochnykh sredstv po gruppam obrazovatelnykh rezultatov. [Guidelines for the creation of evaluation tools for groups of educational outcomes]. Nizhny Novgorod: Mininskiy universitet publ., 2022. 80 p.
  6. Paputkova G.A., Filchenkova I.F. Nekotoryye aspekty nezavisimoy otsenki dostizheniy studentov pedagogicheskikh napravleniy podgotovki [Some aspects of independent assessment of the achievements of students of pedagogical areas of training]. Globalnyy nauchnyy potentsial. 2020. No. 11 (116). pp. 174-176.
  7. Perevoshchikova E.N. Obrazovatelnyye rezultaty v podgotovke budushchego pedagoga i sredstva otsenki ikh dostizheniya [Educational results in the preparation of a future teacher and means of assessing their achievement]. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta. 2022. Available at: https://vestnik.mininuniver.ru/jour/article/view/1325 (date of access: 06.01. 2023).
  8. Perevoshchikova E.N. Kriterialnyy podkhod k otsenivaniyu kak klyuchevoy komponent sistemy nezavisimoy otsenki obrazovatelnykh rezultatov budushchikh pedagogov [Criteria approach to assessment as a key component of the system of independent evaluation of educational results of future teachers]. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta. 2021. Vol. 9. No. 3. p. 6. Available at: https://www.minin-vestnik.ru/jour/article/view/1254/844 (date of access: 06.01.2023).
  9. Professionalnyy standart 01.001 - Pedagog (pedagogicheskaya deyatelnost v sfere doshkolnogo, nachalnogo obshchego, osnovnogo obshchego, srednego obshchego obrazovaniya) (vospitatel, uchitel) [Professional standard 01.001 - Teacher (pedagogical activity in the field of preschool, primary general, basic general, secondary general education) (educator, teacher)] [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://fgosvo.ru/fgosvo/index/24/94 (date of access: 10.20.2022).
  10. Teplov B.M. Sposobnosti i odarennost [Abilities and talents]. Moscow, 1941. 274 p.
  11. Federalnyy gosudarstvennyy obrazovatelnyy standart vysshego obrazovaniya - bakalavriat po napravleniyu podgotovki 44.03.05 Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye (s dvumya profilyami podgotovki), utverzhdennyy prikazom Minobrnauki Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 22.02.2018. № 125 [Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education - Bachelor's degree in the field of study 44.03.05 Pedagogical education (with two training profiles), approved by order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of 22.02.2018. No. 125] [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://fgosvo.ru/docs/index/2/1 (date of access: 10.20.2022).
  12. Shityakova N.P., Verkhovykh I.V. Opredeleniye obrazovatelnykh rezultatov osnovnoy professionalnoy obrazovatelnoy programmy kak usloviye obyektivnoy otsenki kachestva obrazovaniya [Determination of educational results of the main professional educational program as a condition for an objective assessment of the quality of education]. Vestnik YUUrGU. Seriya «Obrazovaniye. Pedagogicheskiye nauki». 2018. Vol. 10. No. 3. pp. 15-23.