Predicate-logics-based education model to form individual physical progress agenda

ˑ: 

PhD, Associate Professor M.V. Sleptsova1, 2
Dr. Hab., Professor S.I. Filimonova2
Dr. Hab., Professor L.B. Andryushchenko2
PhD, Associate Professor P.V. Galochkin3
1Voronezh State Pedagogical University, Voronezh
2Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow
3Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow

Objective of the study was to test and analyze benefits of a new predicate-logics-based education model for individual physical progress agenda.
Methods and structure of the study. We sampled for the individual physical progress agenda formatting predicate-logics-based education model testing experiment the 1st year students of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics and Voronezh State Pedagogical University (n= 654) slit up into EG and RG. The RG was trained under the standard academic curriculum; and the EG training was complemented by the individual physical progress agenda formatting predicate-logics-based education model with a set of linguistic benchmarks for the individual physical progress agenda for the whole academic study period.
Results and conclusion. The predicate logics allow creating term-arrays of variables to quantify an individual physical progress trajectory, with these arrays setting progress benchmarks formulated in linguistic notions. We found the predicate logics language applicable for the individual physical progress agenda modeling purposes. The model may be recommended as a promising and relevant research vector to improve efficiency of the education service, provided it is adapted to modern technical methods to facilitate cultivation of healthy lifestyle and improve the physical education and sports services.

Keywords: individual purpose of education, formalization, predicate logics, educational model, individual trajectory.

References

  1. Andréka, H., van Benthem, J. & Németi, I. On A New Semantics for First-Order Predicate Logic. J Philos Logic 46, 259–267 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-017-9429-y.
  2. Andryushchenko, L.B., Filimonova, S., Sleptsova, M., Pakhomova, E., & Kravtsov, B. (2020). Student’s educational goal and formalization of its representation in E-learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Krasnoyarsk Science and Technology City Hall. Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation, 2020. С. 12082. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1691/1/012082.
  3. Filimonova S., Sleptsova M. Pedagogical dimensions in the organization of e-learning in higher education // Espacios. 2020. V41. Issue 37. Art. 8. p.102-111. https://www.revistaespacios.com/a20v41n37/a20v41n37p08.pdf.
  4. Gomez, R., Sridharan, M. & Riley, H. What do you really want to do? Towards a Theory of Intentions for Human-Robot Collaboration. Ann Math Artif Intell 89, 179–208 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-019-09672-4.
  5. Iatrellis O., Savvas I. K., Kameas A. et al. Integrated learning pathways in higher education: A framework enhanced with machine learning and semantics // Education and Information Technologies. 2020. №25. p. 3109-3129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10105-7.
  6. Sleptsova, M.V. Formation of students’ social competence in a virtual educational environment. Educ Inf Technol 24, 743–754 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9798-z.
  7. Sleptsova, M., Sokolova, N., Shamanina, L. & Gubanova, I. (2020). Formalization of the Pedagogical Model by the Language of Predicate Logic. https://doi.org/10.2991/iceder-19.2020.5.
  8. Tiwari, S., Al-Aswadi, F.N. & Gaurav, D. Recent trends in knowledge graphs: theory and practice. Soft Comput (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05756-8.