Dr. Sc. Philos., Professor V.P. Babintsev¹
Postgraduate student Y.A. Goncharuk¹
PhD, Associate Professor S.V. Goncharuk¹
PhD, Associate Professor A.P. Peresypkin^1
1Belgorod State National Research University, Belgorod

Objective of the study was to survey and analyze the academic physical education service benefits for the faculty/ research/ management staff.
Methods and structure of the study. We run a questionnaire survey of the academic faculty and research personnel (n = 300) and management staff (n = 140) in the Belgorod, Kursk and Lipetsk Oblast universities to profile the individual progress agendas; with the questionnaire survey data and analyses additionally verified by interviews of academic physical education experts (n = 20). The experts were requested to verify, among other things the questionnaire survey data and findings and contribute to the interpretations and resultant practical recommendations. We used for the purpose of the study combinations of the following theoretical research methods: analyses, comparisons, data generalization, systematization and modeling. The questionnaire survey was designed to profile the faculty/ research/ management staff attitudes to the progress opportunities offered by the academic physical education system classified into: leisure-time trainings in gyms; university mass physical education events; and the GTO Complex tests.
Results and conclusion. The questionnaire survey data and analyses made it possible to profile the faculty/ research/ management staff attitudes to the progress opportunities offered by the academic physical education system classified into: leisure-time trainings in gyms; university mass physical education events; and the GTO Complex tests. The study found the faculty/ research/ management staff engaged in the academic physical education mostly on an occasional basis, with a special preference for the GTO trainings and tests and some mass physical education events.

Keywords: academic physical education system, individual progress agenda, faculty, research personnel, university management, questionnaire survey, focus group.

References

1. Analiz rezultatov anketirovaniya obuchayushchikhsya Universiteta ITMO «Otnoshenie k fizicheskoy kulture i sportu» [Analysis of results of questionnaire survey of ITMO University students "Attitude to physical education and sports"]. Student sports club "Kronverkskiye barsy». 2013-2016. Available at: https://kronbars.ifmo.ru/news/106/ (date of access 14.11.2020).
2. Goncharuk Y.A. Issledovanie udovletvorennosti sub'ektov fizkulturno-obrazovatelnogo prostranstva vuza [Study of satisfaction of subjects of academic physical educational space]. Gumanitarnye, sotsialno-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki. 2018. No. 11. pp. 21-22.
3. Goncharuk Y.A. K voprosu obosnovaniya fizkulturno-obrazovatelnogo prostranstva vysshey shkoly [On substantiating academic physical education space]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Ser. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. 2019. No. 1. pp. 32-36.
4. Gushchina L.Y. Emotsionalno-tsennostnoe otnoshenie studentov k uchastiyu v sportivno-massovykh meropriyatiyakh [Emotional-value attitude of students to participation in sports events]. Moscow: ONV publ. 2011. No. 2 (96). pp. 148-151.