Low-intensity functionality tests in rehabilitation service: physiological grounds

ˑ: 

PhD, Associate Professor R.G. Ardeev1
PhD, Associate Professor T.I. Gornaya1
PhD, Associate Professor E.A. Evsetsova1
PhD, Associate Professor Yu.V. Sirenko2
PhD, Associate Professor R.R. Fattakhova2
1Birsk branch of Bashkir State University, Birsk
2Eastern Academy of Economics, Law and Humanities (VEGU Academy), Ufa

The main role in the adaptation of the body to functional tests belongs to the cardiovascular system, which is an integral part of the adaptation problem. To preserve the optimal state of the body, the cardiovascular system is to adequately distribute the blood to the blood vessels. The article analyzes the cardiovascular system responses to the low-intensity functionality tests in the 22-29 year olds. The sample was tested by the cycle ergometer tests at 0.25 W/kg in the passive (motor-assisted) and non-resisted cycling modes. The cardiovascular system adaptation mechanisms were analyzed using the three-polar chest rheography. Every subject was tested in a quiescent state and then by passive cycling tests in the two work modes followed by the functionality tests.
The study showed significant differences in the cardiovascular system responses and central haemodynamics rates in the sample – that may be interpreted as differences in the cardiovascular system responses to the low-intensity physical workloads. Of special interest for the study purposes were the passive motor-assisted cycling tests rated at 60 rotations per min – free of serious muscle stresses in the adaptation process associated with reductions in the vascular tonus and blood pressure. These tested responses expand our knowledge of the natural physiological responses to the low-intensity physical workloads and may open up new opportunities for the rehabilitation service and special controlled physical training models.

Keywords: physical workload, heart rate, minute blood stroke, blood pressure.

References

  1. Ardeev R.G., Shayakhmetov N.N., Shayanurova L.R. Passivnoe vrashchenie veloergometra - kak funktsinalnaya proba [Passive pedaling on bicycle ergometer as functional test]. Aktualnye problemy fizicheskoy kultury, sporta i turizma [Current problems of physical education, sports and tourism]. Proc. XI internat. res.-pract. conf. 2017. pp. 324-325.
  2. Vanyushin Yu.S., Shayakhmetov N.N., Ardeev R.G. Vliyanie passivnogo vrascheniya pedaley veloergometra na serdechno-sosudistuyu sistemu yunoshey i devushek [Effect of passive pedaling on bicycle ergometer on cardiovascular system of young men and women]. Mezhdunarodny nauchno-issledovatelskiy zhurnal. 2014. no. 4-1 (23).pp. 88-89.
  3. Gayton A.K. Minutny ob'em serdtsa i ego regulyatsiya [Cardiac output and its regulation]. Moscow: Meditsina publ., 1962. P. 472.
  4. Kupriyanov S.V. Fiziologicheskaya rol sosudistykh refleksogennykh zon v integrativnoy regulyatsii funktsiy dykhaniya i krovoobrashcheniya [Physiological role of vascular reflexogenic zones in integrative regulation of respiratory and blood circulation functions]. Doct. diss. abstr.. (Med.). Kazan, 2009. 317 p.
  5. Shayakhmetov N.N. Vliyanie fizicheskoy nagruzki maloy moshchnosti na serdechno-sosudistuyu sistemu yunoshey i devushek [Effect of low-intensity physical load on cardiovascular system of young men and women]. PhD diss. abstr.. . Kiev, 2013. 22 p.
  6. Shayakhmetov N.N., Vanyushin Yu.S., Ardeev R.G. Osobennosti nasosnoy funktsii serdtsa yunoshey i devushek pri fizicheskih nagruzkah maloy moschnosti [Heart pumping function characteristics in young men and women during low-intensity exercise]. Fundamentalnye issledovaniya. 2013. no.1-2. pp. 312-314.
  7. Pogarell O., Gasser T., Van Hilten J.J., et al. Pramipexole in patients with Parkinson’s disease and marked drug resistant tremor: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled multicentre study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 2002; 72: 1-7
  8. Moller J.C., Oertel W.H., Koster J., et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of Prami pexole in advanced Parkinsons disease: results from a European multicenter trial. Mov Dis 2005; 5: 602–610.
  9. Takahashi C.D., Der-Yeghiaian L., Le V, Motiwala R.R., Cramer S.C. Robotbased hand motor therapy after stroke. Brain. 2008;131(2): 425-437.
  10. Ridgel A., Vitek J.L., Alberts J.L. Forced-exercise improves motor function in Parkinson’s disease patients. Neurorehab and Neral Repair 2009; 23(6). 600-608.