Relationship of kinematic variables of selected aerobic gymnastic leap (kinematic characteristics of switch split leap

ˑ: 

Dr.Hab., PhD, Associate Professor Oľga Kyselovičová1
Associate Professor Svetlana M. Lukina2
Master, postgraduate student Anita Lamošová1
Master, postgraduate student Katarína Péliová1
Master, PhD Adriána Krnáčová1
1Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, Slovakia
2Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg

Although many variables influence success in the sport, biomechanical considerations as reflected in correct or incorrect technique, particularly in gymnastics are more than decisive. The present study analyses relationships of the kinematic characteristics of Switch Split Leap 1/1 Turn to Split in culmination phase, executed by the Slovak aerobic gymnastic champion (age = 23 years, height = 158 cm, body weight = 52 kg). The indicators that appear to be a key in terms of correct technique were measured: the angles between the body segments, the height and velocity of the centre of the mass. Measurements were carried out by Simi Motion 3D system in the Laboratory of Biomotorics Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University in Brno, Czech Republic. Eight synchronised industrial cameras were used to collect the data. Spearman's analysis confirmed the high degree of dependence between the leg angle of split position and the velocity at the culmination (r = 0.829). On the contrary, the correlation between the leg angle of split and the height of the centre of the mass was manifested as non-significant (r = -0.441). Analysis of the results enabled us to reveal the errors in technique of the element. Additionally, it helps to ease the identification of the key phases, movement of the limbs and the CoM, resulting in enhancement of technical preparation.

Keywords: aerobic gymnastics, 3D analysis, kinematic characteristics, Switch Split Leap 1/1 Turn to Split.

References

  1. Aleksandraviciene R., Zaicenkoviene K., stasiule l., stasiulis a. Physiological Responses and Energetics of Competitive Group Exercise in Female Aerobic Gymnasts with Different Levels of Performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2015, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 787-803. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2466/29.26.PMS.120v15x7
  2. Ashby B.M., Heegaard J.H. Role of arm motion in the standing long jump. Journal of Biomechanics, 2002, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1631-1637. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12445616
  3. Binovský A. Limbs connections. Anatomy for the athletes. Bratislava: Comenius University in Bratislava, 2010, pp. 131-154.
  4. Cicchella A. Kinematics analysis of selected rhythmic gymnastic leaps. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 2009, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 40-47.
  5. Farana R., Jandacka D., Uchytil J., Zahradnik D., IRWIN G. The influence of hand position on biomechanical injury risk factors at the wrist joint during the round-off skills in female gymnastics. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2017, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 124-129.
  6. Federation Internationale de Gymnastique (FIG). Aerobic Gymnastics 2017 – 2020 Code of Points. 2017. Available at: http://www.fig-gymnastics.com/publicdir/rules/files/aer/AER_CoP_2017-202...
  7. Hutchinson M.R., Tremain L., Christiansen J., Beitzel J. Improving leaping ability in elite rhythmic gymnasts. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 1998, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1543-1547.
  8. Cihová I. Practical examples of using the two-dimensional analysis in evaluation of women triple jumps. Athletic 2006 – scientific textbook. Bratislava: ICM Agency, 2006, p. 248-251.
  9. Cihová I., Koštial J. Inter- and intra-individual changes of kinematic characteristics of women triple jumps. Kinematic structure of racing and training movement activity and its changes in training process of athletes from different specializations with regard to somatic characteristics. Bratislava: ICM Agency, 2005, p. 58-65.Krnáčová A., Kyselovičová O., Péliová K. 2018. Kinematic characteristics of side somersault on the beam. Proceedings 11th International conference on kinanthropology "Sport and quality of life". Brno: Masaryk University, 2017, pp. 53-62.
  10. Mezei M., Cristea O. Performance criteria in Aerobic Gymnastics – Impact on the Sportive Training. Procedia – Soial and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, vol. 117, pp. 367-373. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814017595
  11. Muyor J.M., Zemková E., Chren M. Effects of Latin style professional dance on the spinal posture and pelvic tilt. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 2017, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 791-800. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28372311
  12. Muyor J.M., Zemková E., Štefániková G., Kotyra M. Concurrent validity of clinical tests for measuring hamstring flexibility in school age children. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 2014, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 664-669. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24424962