Dr. Hab., Professor Sinyavsky N.I.
Surgut State Pedagogical University, Surgut

Postgraduate student Minibayeva Sh.B.
Surgut State Pedagogical University, Surgut

PhD, Associate Professor Davydova S.A.
Nizhnevartovsk State University, Nizhnevartovsk

PhD, Associate Professor Korichko Y.V.
Nizhnevartovsk State University, Nizhnevartovsk
 

Objective of the study is aimed at determining the position of physical education teachers regarding the organization and integration of the "Ready for Work and Defense" complex into the structure of preschool education.
Methods and structure of the study. 102 physical education teachers from preschool institutions in Surgut, Nizhnevartovsk, and Surgut district took part in the survey.
Results and conclusions. The survey showed that physical education teachers in the framework of the educational program "physical development" are satisfied with the available material and technical support for lessons. It is noticeable that preschool children have increased interest in physical exercises and sports activities. To assess the effectiveness of development in this area, the importance of systematic training is emphasized, including comprehensive physical fitness checks three times a year, as well as constant monitoring of health indicators by medical professionals.

Keywords: survey, physical education teachers, preschool institutions, GTO complex.

References

1. Abramova, T. F., Nikitina, T. M., Polfuntikova, A. V., & Pukhov, D. N. (2020). Mesto fizicheskogo razvitiya i podgotovlennosti detej kak markerov effektivnosti fizicheskoj aktivnosti [The place of physical development and fitness of children as markers of the effectiveness of physical activity]. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kul'tury, 8, 58–60.
2. Davydova, S. A., Galeev, A. R., Sinyavsky, N. I., & Fursov, A. V. (2021). Kompleks GTO kak osnova fizkulturno‑ozdorovitelnoj i sportivnoj raboty v shkole: uchebnoe posobie [The GTO complex as the basis for physical education, health and sports work at school: A teaching aid]. Nizhnevartovsk State University.
3. Kazakova, O. A., Khusainova, T. A., Surkova, D. R., & Ivanova, L. A. (2022). Kompleks GTO kak osnova fizkulturno‑ozdorovitelnoj i sportivno‑massovoj raboty v shkole: uchebno‑metodicheskoe posobie [GTO in preschool education]. Nauchnye zapiski imeni P.F. Lesgafta, 1(203), 157–160.
4. Sinyavsky, N. I., Grigoriev, V. A., Fursov, A. V., & Losev, V. Yu. (2018). Otnoshenie instruktorov po fizicheskoj kulture k organizacii fizicheskogo vospitaniya v doshkolnyh obrazovatelnyh uchrezhdeniyah [Attitude of physical education instructors to the organization of physical education in preschool educational institutions]. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury, 7, 89–93.
5. Sinyavsky, N. I., Losev, V. Yu., Fursov, A. V., & Apokin, V. V. (2019). Otnoshenie instruktorov po fizicheskoj kulture k vnedreniyu kompleksa GTO v doshkolnyh obrazovatelnyh uchrezhdeniyah [Attitude of physical education instructors to the implementation of the GTO complex in preschool educational institutions]. Fizicheskaya kultura: vospitanie, obrazovanie, trenirovka, 4, 64–66.
6. Fedoseeva, A. R. (2020). Modelirovanie processa fizicheskogo vospitaniya starshih doshkol'nikov s napravlennostyu na formirovanie gotovnosti k vypolneniyu normativov GTO (1 stupen) [Modeling the process of physical education of senior preschoolers with a focus on forming readiness to perform GTO standards (Stage 1)]. Nauchnye zapiski imeni P.F. Lesgafta, 1(179), 319–324.