PhD, Associate Professor S.V. Radaeva¹
PhD V. S. Sosunovsky¹
PhD, Associate Professor L.M. Bezhentseva^1
1National Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk

Objective of the study was to survey the students’ progress in adaptation to the modern distance physical education service formats, their benefits and drawbacks.
Methods and structure of the study. We sampled for the survey the 18-20 year-old (1-3-year) special health group students (n=768, 64.7% female and 35.3% male sample) from the Humanities, Natural Sciences and Physics and Mathematics Departments of the National Research Tomsk State University. Own distance physical education adaptation was rated excellent, good, satisfactory and poor by 34%, 42%, 20% and 4% of the sample, respectively.
Results and conclusion. The distance physical education service was found beneficial under certain conditions as it makes the training process more versatile, optional, mobile, free in time and space and, hence, more effective; albeit such service formats may be still challenging when combined with the traditional collective trainings in classes and gyms.
Generally, the modern distance physical education service formats may be beneficial for many academic physical education goals. The questionnaire survey data and analyses of the students’ adaptation and attitude to the distance physical education give grounds to make recommendations on how the distance physical education service should be designed and managed for success.

Keywords: distance education, COVID-19 pandemic.

References

1. Voronin D.M., Voronina E.G., Kiselev A.V. et al. Organizatsiya zanyatiy fizicheskoy kulturoy v distantsionnom formate [Organization of distance physical education lessons]. Sovremennye zdorovyesberegayushchie tekhnologii. 2020. No. 2. pp. 7-18.
2. Zagrevskiy V.I., Zagrevskiy O.I. Adaptivnoe upravlenie kak instrument ustraneniya dvigatelnoy oshibki sportsmena [Adaptive control as tool to eliminate movement errors in athletes]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury. 2020. No. 10. pp. 21-23.
3. Inozemtseva E.S., Khatskaleva E.G. Osobennosti zanyatiy fizicheskoy kulturoy s ispolzovaniem sredstv khudozhestvennoy gimnastiki s devushkami 20-25 let [Benefits of rhythmic gymnastics tools for physical education of 20-25 year old females]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury. 2017. No. 10. pp. 89-90.
4. Maksimov D.N., Abzalova S.V. Primenenie informatsionnykh resursov na distantsionnykh zanyatiyakh po fizicheskoy kulture [Information resources in distance physical education lessons]. Voprosy pedagogiki. 2021. No. 1-2. pp. 167-170.
5. Sosunovskiy V.S., Zagrevskaya A.I. Kineziologicheskaya obrazovatelnaya tekhnologiya fizicheskogo vospitaniya doshkolnikov [Kinesiological educational technology in physical education of preschoolers]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury. 2020. No. 11. pp. 68-70.